Evaluation of phd dissertation
Phd examiners report
Assessment of the PhD dissertation The standard scope of an assessment is about pages and a specific form is used. Final version The dissertation is screened for duplicate text. The supervisor cannot be one of the examiners. Scope The scope of the dissertation should be briefly outlined; what is the purpose, why, who is it aimed at, what are the boundaries of the study, what is included and what is not? It is important that the opponents should also bring out the positive aspects of the dissertation in their opposition. It is the responsibility of the chairman of the committee to divide the work among the members of the assessment committee and to integrate the individual contributions so that the assessment forms a whole without inconsistencies in style or opinions. They are chosen, if possible, from outside the student's faculty. It should not be a summary, but a short description of the range or span of the dissertation. The conclusion, either positive og negative, should be formulated clearly and placed in the end of the document. Before the dissertation is graded, the postgraduate student must be reserved the opportunity to write a rejoinder to the statements. In exceptional cases, the dissertation can be in Danish if the student has applied for and been granted exemption. Conclusion On the basis of the above-mentioned criteria, the assessment should reach a conclusion that states whether or not the dissertation complies with the international standard for PhD dissertations in the field of health sciences. Is the handling of relevant literature satisfactory?
Candidates for the Degree of Dr. Dissertation The committee that evaluates the dissertation shall produce a report on the dissertation. The assessment must be approved by the Head of the Graduate School of Health before the public defence can take place.
Is the summary comprehensible?
Phd thesis evaluation report in india
Rejected If the assessment committee finds that the academic level in the original dissertation does not comply with the international standard for PhD dissertations in the field of health sciences, and that the quality of the dissertation is below an adequate level for acceptance, the assessment committee should recommend the dissertation for rejection. Finally, language and presentation skills can be commented on, if necessary. Within a week of the defence the chairman of the committee sends a signed assessment of the public defence to the Graduate School of Health based on the discussion with the other members of the committee and using a specific form. The supervisor cannot be one of the examiners. After submission it is therefore not possible to make any changes to the wording, correction of spelling mistakes or replace papers in manuscript form with published articles etc. The following questions should then be addressed: Is the aim clear? The Dean decides on giving the doctoral candidate permission for public examination on the basis on the preliminary examiner's statements and the candidate's possible rejoinder. The conclusion must be in compliance with the prior premises in the report. If the disseration is in fact rejected, the PhD student will be disenrolled from the PhD prgramme without obtaining a degree. The Custos then writes a statement about the proceedings of the public examination. A mere summary of the paper is not sufficient, as the aim is to achieve a critical assessment on a par with an assessment of a manuscript by international referees. Have the results been clearly described? This statement must be signed by both the PhD student and the main supervisor. Co-author declarations must be included for each contribution where the submitted PhD dissertation includes work by several authors. After the public examination, the Custos, the opponent s and the faculty representative hold a meeting to discuss grading.
After submission it is therefore not possible to make any changes to the wording, correction of spelling mistakes or replace papers in manuscript form with published articles etc.
The committee should as far as possible give the report a general and concise form. Finally, language and presentation skills can be commented on, if necessary. The management then makes the final decision on whether the PhD student is asked to resubmit the PhD dissertation to the assessment committee, resubmit to a new assessment committee or whether the dissertation is rejected completely.
based on 100 review