Note: the graph represents functions not chapters and it may well be that these functions do not line up neatly with chapters.
Write out a few research questions that address contested positions in the debate, or that fill a gap in the literature. In papers where you need to trace the history or chronology of events or issues, it is important to arrange your outline in the same manner, knowing that it's easier to re-arrange things now than when you've almost finished your paper.
How do you know whether to change the paper to fit the outline, or, that you need to reconsider the outline so that it fits the paper? Having a consistent, clear argument throughout your thesis makes all of the above much easier.
While you do this, be aware of whether you need to increase the number of words, or decrease it to reach your target.
It is worth taking time to develop a logical structure as this will help to convince examiners of the relevance of your research, and that you understand its relevance.
Max Fisher, a very respected foreign affairs blogger, had his analysis picked apart by Siddartha Mitter and by Stephen Saideman. So what? Some assumptions to be clear about 1. It might be useful to look at how others have managed. In addition to the research context, there may be other relevant contexts to present for example: theoretical context; practice context; and political context.
You will need it to be succinct, specific, descriptive, and representative of the research you have done. Alternatively it can be useful to write the abstract earlier on, as an aid to identifying the crucial main thread of your research, its purpose, and its findings, which could then guide the structure of the dissertation.