When the leeves broke essay

How to cite this page Choose cite format:. Based on reports from the news agencies that survived the storm, no help showed up for 5 days. His personality is best described as that of a ticking time bomb. Lee interviews a melting pot of people in this documentary. The creator uses the film in an attempt to argue that the federal government did not do its part to help the people of New Orleans after the disaster. This fits a step of critically thinking in our book: perceiving and believing. Lee does not hesitate to put a floating, swollen dead body on screen just to let the viewers know the grotesque reality of what happened. These tactics make it quite easy to see that Lee is upset with the Government. The essence of its true catastrophic nature however, lies in the social injustice inflicted upon people of colour, the poor, the homeless, elderly, and disabled at the hands of the very government that is supposed to protect and serve them. Of course the news agencies flashed this all over the news channels and that added to the already growing anger towards the federal government. On the 23 of that August, Hurricane Katrina was set to make contact with the area where New Orleans was located This beauty of New Orleans is one of the reasons why the summer of was so devastating. Diversity and unifying people under their disappointment with the government is a key part of his argument. Not too sure how much critically thinking was going on here, or was there, and the people of New Orleans could not do anything else but stay. Needless to say, Lee will not hesitate to tell anyone what he believes and is the center of many different controversies in Hollywood.

Why did some stay? This is his premise from the onset and he uses the documentary to defend his point as opposed to coming to this conclusion afterwards.

when the levees broke rhetorical analysis essay

I on the other hand, as being a first responder from the military 2 days post impact, did not experience or witness any response as being racial. It is not unlikely that Lee took this story and made it a huge ordeal just to stir up controversy in Washington and against Bush, whom he does not support.

Was this the truth or inferring due to the situation they were in? However, he fails at arguing that point due to his one-sidedness and his personal background. If he had shown these people then his argument would be much stronger. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. So because they perceived and believed nothing would happen, a lot of people perished. After the levees broke, the press commented that Hurricane Katrina has put an end to the annual celebration of the Southern Decadence which brought thousands of revelers for the homosexual celebration which was even acknowledge by its past city officials Releases. Obradovich February 8, In August there was a massive storm brewing and growing into a storm like no other storm, Hurricane Katrina. His personality is best described as that of a ticking time bomb. He has so many critiques of things that this argument really just gets lost in the sea of them all. Many people died from all sorts of different causes. Along with host of others, especially those in the documentary, he felt the government blatantly ignored the plight of African Americans— treating the displaced victims like refugees. This injury may not stop the person from doing day-to-day activities, but leaves no trust in other people because that individual sees a barrier between them being a regular person. He really wanted to get the story out to the public and that is exactly what he did, he let the world see exactly what was happening in New Orleans without any sugar coating. Since, if it is race related, where are the least of its brethren, the Diasporas, the Africans and African-Americans and the rest with other backgrounds of ethnicity.

The prolonged crisis after the hurricane in the New Orleans does not only envelope the lack in material resources but more so in the lack of concerns for the simple reason that man is repealed by holocaust or in other words, man has the natural tendency to run away from destruction than to rebuild.

Needless to say, Lee will not hesitate to tell anyone what he believes and is the center of many different controversies in Hollywood.

Lee does not hesitate to put a floating, swollen dead body on screen just to let the viewers know the grotesque reality of what happened.

Who were these people? On that same day Katrina caused 53 different levee breaches in greater New Orleans, spilling the waters of Lake Pontchartrain into the city and flooding an overwhelming majority of New Orleans. Spike Lee is known to make movies that examine race relations and political issues. References Lee, Spike. The audience only sees the people who are disgruntled by Katrina who just want more and more help. Obradovich February 8, In August there was a massive storm brewing and growing into a storm like no other storm, Hurricane Katrina. Hurricane Katrina was a natural disaster. Walking in the neighborhoods of New Orleans — or walking anywhere in general, actually — gives one a different view of the sceneries than if one were to drive through the neighborhoods. This caused over four fifths of metropolitan New Orleans to be flooded. The name of the tragic disastrous storm is Hurricane Katrina.

The documentary showed the total devastation of the area. However, years have passed and it seems that there is social and physical distance that makes it difficult to arrest the problem. It is for this reason that the prolonged rehabilitation of the city is not due to the social issue of race discrimination but the inability of those concerns to make a collaborative efforts in rebuilding their state.

when the levees broke trailer

Lee undoubtedly does a good job of evoking emotion from the audience. The first time you see a destroyed home or a dead body you want to cry for the victims but after hours and hours of seeing the same thing you become used to seeing it.

That is why his argument can be somewhat discredited by his background. Diversity and unifying people under their disappointment with the government is a key part of his argument.

when the levees broke analysis
Rated 9/10 based on 56 review
Download
When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts